export const prerender = true; Ethereum Token Launch — $10K Budget, 90/10 Split

Simulate a $10K Ethereum Token Launch with a 90/10 Split

A 90/10 split on a $10K Ethereum budget is a defensive configuration: $9,000 goes to pool liquidity and just $1,000 to token acquisition. The anti-sniper logic is clear on Ethereum mainnet, where MEV bots monitor the mempool constantly — a deeper pool means sniper sells produce more price impact on the way out, compressing bot profitability. The tradeoff is a near-zero founder position: only what $1,000 can purchase from a $9,000 pool. The simulator shows the exact supply ownership that results and whether the liquidity improvement over 80/20 justifies the ownership sacrifice.

For educational and illustrative purposes only. Not financial or investment advice. Simulated results do not predict actual market outcomes.

Scenario Parameters

Chain

Ethereum

TGE Capital

$10K

Liquidity Split

90/10

Total Supply

1,000,000,000

Liquidity (L)

$9,000

Acquisition (P)

$1,000

Open in Calculator →

Key Concepts for This Scenario

Frequently Asked Questions

Why would a founder use 90/10 at $10K on Ethereum?

The main reason is anti-sniper defence. On Ethereum mainnet, MEV bots watch the mempool for new pool creation and immediately buy at the initial price. A 90/10 split sends $9,000 to the pool instead of $7,000 or $8,000, making sniper exits more costly due to higher price impact on their sells. The tradeoff is almost no founder ownership. It is a pool-depth signal, not an accumulation strategy.

With just $1,000 for acquisition on Ethereum at 90/10, is the founder position meaningful?

It is minimal. A $1,000 buy against a $9,000 pool is roughly 11% of liquidity, resulting in a small absolute token count. The simulator calculates the exact number of tokens $1,000 purchases and the resulting supply ownership percentage. Teams using 90/10 typically do not rely on this initial position and plan to acquire more from the open market over time.

How does a $9,000 Ethereum pool at 90/10 handle sniper sell pressure compared to 80/20?

Deeper pools absorb sells with less price impact per dollar sold. In a $9,000 pool (90/10), a sniper sell of 10% of liquidity causes roughly 10% price decline. In the $8,000 pool (80/20), the same proportional sell causes slightly more impact because the pool is shallower in absolute terms. The simulator lets you run both and compare sell sequence outcomes side by side.

Related Scenarios

Ready to model your own scenario?

Adjust every parameter and see results in real time.

Launch Calculator →

← All scenarios

Get Token Launch Insights

Free AMM simulation tips, launch strategies, and tool updates. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime.