export const prerender = true; Base Token Launch — $5K Budget, 90/10 Split

Simulate a $5K Base Token Launch with a 90/10 Split

A 90/10 split at $5K on Base puts $4,500 into the liquidity pool and just $500 toward token acquisition. Base's low gas costs make the $500 acquisition efficient — every cent converts to tokens — and the Coinbase Wallet integration means the pool is accessible to retail participants without high friction. Base has active bots but lower MEV activity than Ethereum mainnet, so the deep-pool anti-sniper argument applies at a reduced level. The $4,500 pool is the deepest available at this budget tier on Base. The simulator shows what $500 actually buys and how thin the resulting founder position is.

For educational and illustrative purposes only. Not financial or investment advice. Simulated results do not predict actual market outcomes.

Scenario Parameters

Chain

Base

TGE Capital

$5K

Liquidity Split

90/10

Total Supply

1,000,000,000

Liquidity (L)

$4,500

Acquisition (P)

$500

Open in Calculator →

Key Concepts for This Scenario

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 90/10 viable for a $5K Base launch, given the low-MEV environment on L2?

On Base, the case for 90/10 is less about sniper defence and more about launching with maximum liquidity at minimum budget. Base has a single sequencer (Coinbase) that controls transaction ordering, which limits certain MEV attack vectors. That said, bots still target new pools on Base. The 90/10 split creates the deepest possible pool at $5K, which benefits all participants through lower slippage regardless of the MEV context.

With only $500 for acquisition on Base at 90/10, can the founder build a meaningful position?

At this level, the $500 acquisition is more symbolic than strategic. A $500 buy against a $4,500 pool produces roughly 11% trade-to-pool ratio and a very small ownership percentage. Teams running 90/10 at $5K on Base are typically doing so to test a concept, build a community-owned token, or use it as a stepping stone before adding more liquidity. The simulator shows the exact ownership figure so you can set accurate expectations.

How does a $4,500 Base pool at 90/10 compare to the equivalent on Solana in slippage terms?

The AMM math is chain-agnostic — $4,500 of liquidity produces identical slippage curves on Base and Solana. A $225 trade (5% of depth) causes roughly 5% price impact on both chains. The difference is ecosystem context: Base connects to Coinbase Wallet retail users, while Solana connects to a higher-frequency trading community. The simulator models the math identically; the chain choice is a distribution decision.

Related Scenarios

Ready to model your own scenario?

Adjust every parameter and see results in real time.

Launch Calculator →

← All scenarios

Get Token Launch Insights

Free AMM simulation tips, launch strategies, and tool updates. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime.